청량리영어◆ 일대일과외로 자신감쑥쑥! 문법,읽기,쓰기 등 영역별로 깊이 있고 체계적인 학습을 시작해야 합니다. 청량리영어과외기본적인 문법 정리, 전체적인 내용을 잏하는 식의 읽기에 만족해서는 안됩니다. 청량리영어과외문법을 적용한 세부 문장을 이해하고, 각 어휘의 정확한 의미를 익히고, 더 나아가 본인의 생각을 영어로 쓰고 말할 줄 알아랴 합니다. 단, 우리 아이의 상황을 정화히 파악하여 무리하게 시작하지 않도록 해야 영어에 대한 흥미를 잃지 않을 수 있습니다. 아이가 6학년에 들어가면 가능한 한 영문법을 1회 이상 정리시켜 중학교에 가서 배워야 할 어법들의 선행학습을 미리 보도록 합니다. 뉴스를 듣고 내용을 요약해서 쓰는 등의 청취력 강화 훈련동 필요합니다. 여러가지 인증시험을 통하여 나의 실력을 확인해 보는 것도 좋습니다. and his school wrote, another group of ◆historians was setting out on the full rehabilitation of Johnson, using for the first time primary sources such as his papers, provided by his daughter Martha before her death in 1901, and the diaries of Johnson's Navy Secretary, Gideon Welles, first published in 1911. The resulting volumes, such as David Miller DeWitt's The Impeachment and Trial of President Andrew Johnson (1903), presented him far more favorably than they did those who had sought to oust him. In James Schouler's 1913 History of the Reconstruction Period, the author accused Rhodes of being "quite unfair to Johnson", though agreeing that the former president had created many of his own problems through ◆inept political moves. These works had an effect; although historians continued to view Johnson as having deep flaws which sabotaged his presidency, they saw his Reconstruction policies as fundamentally correct.[210] Castel writes: at the end of the 1920s, an historiographical ◆revolution took place. In the span of three years five widely read ◆books appeared, all highly pro-Johnson....They differed in general approach and specific interpretations, but they all glorified Johnson and condemned his enemies. According to these writers, Johnson was a humane, enlightened, and liberal statesman who waged a courageous battle for the Constitution and democracy against scheming and unscrupulous Radicals, who were motivated by a vindictive hatred of the South, partisanship, and a desire to establish the supremacy of Northern "big business". In short, rather than a boor, Johnson was a martyr; instead of a villain, a hero.[211] Beale wondered in 1940, "is it not time that we studied the history of Reconstruction without◆first assuming, at least subconsciously, that carpetbaggers and Southern white Republicans were wicked, that Negroes were illiterate incompetents, and that the whole white South owes a debt of gratitude to the restorers of 'white supremacy'?"[212] Despite these doubts, ◆the favorable view of Johnson survived for a time. In 1942, Van Heflin ◆portrayed the former president as a fighter for democracy in the Hollywood film Tennessee Johnson. In 1948, a poll of his colleagues by historian Arthur M. Schlesinger deemed Johnson among the average presidents; in 1956, one by Clinton L. Rossiter named him as one of the near-great Chief Executives.[213] Foner notes that at the time of these surveys, "the Reconstruction era that followed the Civil War was regarded as a time of corruption and misgovernment caused by granting black men the right to vote".[214] Earlier historians, including Beale, believed that money drove events, and had seen Reconstruction as an economic struggle. They also accepted, for the most part, ◆that reconciliation between North and South should have been the top priority of Reconstruction. In the 1950s, historians began to focus on the African-American experience as central to Reconstruction. They rejected completely any claim of black inferiority, which had marked many earlier historical works, and saw the developing
